We watched Dick Hardt's presentation "Identity 2.0". What did you think of his presentation style?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
We will be using this blog as a forum to discuss technology, share ideas and enrich our learning experience.
20 comments:
i like dick hardt's power point style it's nice it has picture and he talks there is more pictures than words
I found it quite funny at the beginning, and it still got its point across. It had a good use of pictures, and his narration was pretty descriptive.
i think the prensentation was good because everytime he put something up it was a small amount of information soyou get everything.
I likes his style you heard clearly what he said and he got his point through. your not distracted by a fancy powerpoint but the power point is a good visuel so you can listen and see what he's talking about... i liked it:)
I think Dick Hardt's presentation was simple, but it it was effective and got to the point. I liked how it was all narrated instead of typed out in paragraphs or lists. It was entertaining so it kept the viewers interested.
I think that his sstyle was much more effective that all the other styles. I think it was more effective because there is less to look at so you can focus on it more.
Hello,
I thought the way Dick Hardt did his powerpoint was very good in a way that he kept people interested. His technique was very detailed and had a few funny parts to keep the atmosphere fresh.
His topic was "Identity 2.0". He gave many examples and described what is identity and the different definitions and different ways it is used.
I also thought it was effective the way Dick Hardt narrated thw whole thing.
I thought it was very well done.
The presentation was done well. Because he didnt use any crazy animation stuff he made his point with a few pictures and words.
I thoought it was cool. I Liked the combination of the words and pictures.
|0|
_-_-_
_-_000_-_
I thought it was funny and it's definatley a better way to get people listening. There's not alot of things more boring than wathching a powerpoint with a thousand words on each page and trying to read them in all of three seconds, while the presenter might be talking about whatever, but i wouldn't know what there saying because i'm too busy reading the page. So ya, i like Dick's way alot better.
I thoought it was cool. I Liked the combination of the words and pictures.
|0|
_-_-_
_-_000_-_
this is a double post due to
bad post
I thoought it was cool. I Liked the combination of the words and pictures.
|0|
_-_-_
_-_000_-_
I found his presentation, and the way he presented it, effective, but still easy to understand.
i thought the power point is a lot better than a power point with lots of words. it's easy to understand and i think it's a better way to get your message across than tring to get people to read a lot of words on each page in about 3 seconds.
I liked how he stuck to some of the power point styals (transition/animation)and how he also changed the usual way it's presented (one picture/word per page... etc)
I liked it because there were pictures and it wasn't just a list of things.
I thoought it was cool. I Liked the combination of the words and pictures.
. |0|
. _-_-_
. _-_000_-_
Hello,
I think that the presentation was very simple, but t got the message through. It was funny at some tmes too. I praise Dick
P.S. it's creative!
Ruthie aka emma
Dick Hardt's powerpoint was funny and good because it caught your attention and was interesting so you wouldn't get bored.
Ree
i think dick hardt's power point was good because not all the information was crowded onto one page but there was somethign to back up what he said. and it was pretty funny too.
Jenny
Post a Comment